Summary judgment is a powerful litigation tool, but it can be abused. Learn how some litigants misuse summary judgment motions to pressure settlements and the ethical and strategic implications of this practice.
Summary judgment is a critical tool in litigation that allows a party to seek a ruling without a full trial when there are no genuine disputes over material facts. However, like many legal tools, summary judgment can be misused. One of the more concerning abuses of summary judgment is when it is used strategically to pressure the opposing party into settlement, rather than to resolve a legitimate legal issue.
In this article, Legal Husk explores how summary judgment can be abused to force settlements, the ethical concerns surrounding such practices, and how litigators can protect their clients from this type of pressure.
✅ The primary goal of summary judgment is to provide a fair and efficient means of resolving cases when there is no factual dispute that would require a trial. However, some litigants attempt to use the motion for summary judgment as a tactical weapon to intimidate or pressure the opposing party into settling. This typically occurs when a party knows that the other side lacks sufficient resources to effectively oppose the motion or when the motion is filed in bad faith to delay proceedings or force a settlement.
Using Summary Judgment to Delay Trials: Some litigants file motions for summary judgment with the knowledge that the opposing party will struggle to respond adequately, especially if they lack the resources to conduct discovery or gather evidence. This delay tactic forces the opposing party to decide whether to settle to avoid the expense of opposing the motion.
Example: "A defendant in a complex commercial case might file a motion for summary judgment to delay the trial, knowing that the plaintiff will incur significant costs to oppose the motion and may eventually settle due to financial constraints."
Strategically Filing Summary Judgment to Force Settlement: In some cases, the mere filing of a motion for summary judgment can create pressure on the opposing party, especially if the court grants the motion. Even if the motion is unlikely to succeed, it can force the opposing party to settle to avoid the time, expense, and uncertainty of continuing litigation.
Example: "A party in a debt collection case might file a motion for summary judgment even when there are factual disputes, hoping that the plaintiff will settle rather than face the expense of defending against the motion."
Misusing Summary Judgment in Meritorious Claims: In cases where the facts are genuinely disputed, summary judgment should not be filed. However, some litigants file summary judgment motions despite clear factual disagreements, attempting to push for a settlement by forcing the other side into a difficult position.
Example: "In a personal injury case, a defendant might file a motion for summary judgment despite genuine factual disputes over the circumstances of the injury, hoping that the plaintiff will settle rather than go to trial."
🎯 Strategic Tip: Be cautious of motions for summary judgment filed in bad faith or with the intent to pressure a settlement. Ensure that any motion you file is based on genuine legal grounds and is not designed to exploit the process.
✅ The misuse of summary judgment to pressure settlement raises serious ethical concerns. Litigators have an ethical duty to act in good faith and not use legal procedures to exploit the weaknesses of the opposing party or to manipulate the legal system for strategic advantage.
Abuse of the Judicial Process: Filing a summary judgment motion with the intent to coerce a settlement is an abuse of the judicial process. This misuse can undermine public trust in the legal system and make it more difficult for parties to have their day in court.
Example: "If a defendant files a summary judgment motion solely to pressure a plaintiff into settling, knowing that the plaintiff cannot afford to oppose the motion, it is an ethical violation of fair legal practice."
Fairness and Access to Justice: The abuse of summary judgment can disproportionately impact plaintiffs, especially those with limited resources. By using summary judgment as a strategic tool to force a settlement, litigants may deprive the plaintiff of their right to a trial and access to justice.
Example: "In cases where a plaintiff lacks the financial resources to fully oppose a summary judgment motion, filing the motion in bad faith can deprive the plaintiff of their right to a fair hearing."
Misleading the Court: Filing a summary judgment motion without a legitimate legal or factual basis may mislead the court into thinking that the case is simple or that there are no genuine disputes over material facts. This can result in an unfair ruling that deprives the opposing party of a fair trial.
Example: "A litigant may submit false or misleading arguments in a motion for summary judgment to create the appearance that there is no dispute, thereby misleading the court into granting judgment prematurely."
🎯 Strategic Tip: Maintain ethical standards in your litigation strategy, ensuring that any motion for summary judgment is based on merit and genuine legal reasoning, rather than as a tool for tactical advantage or settlement pressure.
✅ The abuse of summary judgment to pressure settlements not only harms individual litigants but also has broader consequences for the legal system as a whole. It can lead to an increase in settlement pressures, distort the fairness of legal proceedings, and result in cases being resolved without a full examination of the facts.
Increased Settlements Due to Pressure: When summary judgment is used strategically to force settlements, it can create an environment where cases are resolved based on coercion rather than merit. This can lead to settlements that are unfair or not in the best interest of the parties involved.
Example: "A small business may be forced to settle with a larger corporation that has filed a motion for summary judgment, even if the business has a strong case, simply to avoid the expense of opposing the motion."
Undermining Trust in the System: If parties believe that summary judgment motions are being used to pressure settlements unfairly, it can undermine trust in the legal system. Litigants may feel that they cannot fully rely on the courts to resolve disputes fairly and that legal tactics are being exploited to their disadvantage.
Example: "If parties feel that summary judgment is being used as a bullying tactic rather than a legitimate legal process, they may lose confidence in the fairness of the judicial system."
Excessive Litigation Costs: The misuse of summary judgment can lead to unnecessary legal costs for both parties. Even when a motion is filed in bad faith, the opposing party must still spend time and resources preparing a response, which could have been avoided if the case had proceeded to trial.
Example: "When a party files a motion for summary judgment with the intention of pressuring a settlement, the opposing party may incur significant legal costs simply to defend against the motion, further burdening them financially."
🎯 Strategic Tip: Recognize the long-term impact of settlement pressure through summary judgment motions, and aim to resolve disputes fairly through the legal process rather than by leveraging procedural advantages.
✅ Legal systems have developed safeguards to prevent the abuse of summary judgment motions and to ensure that they are used fairly. Litigators should be aware of these safeguards and adhere to them to maintain the integrity of the litigation process.
Strict Judicial Scrutiny: Courts are generally vigilant when reviewing motions for summary judgment, especially in cases involving significant public or financial interests. Judges are required to ensure that summary judgment is only granted when the facts are clear and undisputed.
Example: "Judges are trained to carefully review the evidence and legal arguments in summary judgment motions, ensuring that the motion is not filed solely to pressure the opposing party."
Disclosure Requirements: Litigants are required to disclose all relevant evidence, including evidence that may be unfavorable to their position, when filing a summary judgment motion. This helps ensure transparency and fairness in the process.
Example: "A party filing for summary judgment must fully disclose all documents and evidence supporting their motion, including evidence that may undermine their argument."
Legal Sanctions for Bad-Faith Motions: Courts have the authority to impose sanctions on parties who file frivolous or bad-faith summary judgment motions. These sanctions may include fines, attorney’s fees, or even dismissal of the motion.
Example: "A party that files a motion for summary judgment with no factual basis may face sanctions for abusing the judicial process, including having to pay the opposing party’s legal fees."
🎯 Strategic Tip: Ensure that your summary judgment motion is well-supported by facts and law, and avoid filing motions that could be perceived as bad-faith or intended to pressure the opposing party.
While summary judgment is a valuable tool in civil litigation, it can be abused when used to pressure the opposing party into settling or to manipulate the legal process. Litigators must act ethically when filing or opposing summary judgment motions, ensuring that they are not used as a weapon for unfair strategic advantage. By adhering to ethical standards and safeguards, attorneys can help maintain the integrity of the legal system and ensure fair outcomes for all parties.
At Legal Husk, we help litigators navigate the complexities of summary judgment motions, ensuring that they are used ethically and effectively in the pursuit of justice.
📌 Need assistance with ethical considerations in filing or opposing summary judgment motions?
👉 Visit:
🔗 legalhusk.com
🔗 legalhusk.com/services
📩 Ready for a court-ready motion for summary judgment at a predictable price? Contact Legal Husk for expert support.
File wisely. Litigate efficiently—Legal Husk.
Whether you are dealing with a complex family matter, facing criminal charges, or navigating the intricacies of business law, our mission is to provide you with comprehensive, compassionate, and expert legal guidance.
