Filing for summary judgment involves strategic decisions. Explore the ethical considerations litigators must keep in mind when filing or opposing summary judgment motions.
Summary judgment is an important tool in civil litigation, allowing parties to seek early resolution of claims when there are no genuine disputes of material fact. However, filing for summary judgment comes with ethical responsibilities. Litigators must ensure that they are not using this tool to manipulate the legal process, take advantage of procedural shortcuts, or deny parties their day in court. In this article, Legal Husk discusses the key ethical considerations that litigators should be aware of when filing or opposing summary judgment motions.
✅ At the core of ethical litigation is the duty to act in good faith. When filing a motion for summary judgment, a litigant is asserting that there is no genuine dispute over material facts. This claim must be made in good faith, based on a genuine belief that the facts support the motion. A motion filed without merit, simply to force the other party to settle or avoid a trial, can be considered unethical.
Accurate Representation: Litigators must accurately represent the facts and legal arguments in their motion for summary judgment. Misleading the court by selectively presenting evidence or mischaracterizing the facts is a violation of ethical standards.
Example: "A party may not file for summary judgment claiming that there is no dispute over material facts if they know that key pieces of evidence exist that could create genuine disputes."
No Frivolous Motions: Filing a motion for summary judgment with the sole purpose of delaying the case or burdening the opposing party is unethical. Litigators must file motions based on a reasonable assessment of the facts and the law, not simply to gain a tactical advantage.
Example: "A defendant should not file a motion for summary judgment in a case with clearly disputed facts, hoping to pressure the plaintiff into settling."
🎯 Strategic Tip: File summary judgment motions only when the facts are clear and undisputed, and ensure that your legal arguments are grounded in the law and the evidence.
✅ Filing motions for summary judgment is part of a litigator's responsibility to advocate zealously for their client. However, this advocacy must be balanced with a duty to avoid abusing the judicial process. Litigators must avoid filing motions with the intent to intimidate, delay, or unduly burden the opposing party.
No Strategic Delay: Using summary judgment motions to delay the resolution of the case or to take advantage of procedural advantages is an abuse of the judicial process. The timing and intent of the motion should align with the legitimate goal of resolving the case on its merits.
Example: "Filing for summary judgment after a prolonged delay in litigation, without a legitimate basis, could be seen as an attempt to delay the case unnecessarily."
Balancing Advocacy and Fairness: While it is the duty of a litigator to zealously advocate for their client, this must be done in a manner that respects the fairness of the process. Using summary judgment motions as a strategic tool to dismiss cases that deserve a full trial is unethical.
Example: "A motion for summary judgment should not be used to dismiss a case where there is a reasonable dispute over material facts that requires a trial to resolve."
🎯 Strategic Tip: Be mindful of the timing and purpose of your motion, ensuring that it serves to resolve the case efficiently, rather than to delay or disadvantage the opposing party unfairly.
✅ When filing a motion for summary judgment, litigators must ensure full disclosure of all relevant facts, even those that may not support their case. Ethical obligations require transparency, including disclosing evidence that could affect the outcome of the motion.
Duty to Disclose Adverse Evidence: Litigators are obligated to disclose evidence that may be detrimental to their case, especially when it could impact the court's determination of whether there is a genuine dispute of material facts. Failure to disclose such evidence could result in sanctions or an unfavorable ruling.
Example: "If a party in a breach of contract case has emails that show both sides may have agreed to a modification of the contract, they must disclose these emails in the motion for summary judgment."
Honest Presentation of Evidence: Litigators must ensure that they present evidence honestly, without misrepresenting or distorting the facts. This includes not cherry-picking evidence to suit a desired outcome, but instead presenting a complete and accurate picture of the case.
Example: "Presenting evidence selectively in order to create a false impression that the facts are clear-cut could lead to ethical violations and undermine the credibility of the motion."
🎯 Strategic Tip: Disclose all relevant evidence, including evidence that may not support your position, to ensure transparency and maintain ethical standards in litigation.
✅ Ethical considerations are not limited to those filing for summary judgment. Litigators who are opposing summary judgment motions also have ethical responsibilities. They must avoid using procedural tactics simply to delay the case or to prevent a resolution on the merits.
Good Faith Opposition: When opposing a motion for summary judgment, the opposing party must have a good faith basis for asserting that a genuine dispute of material fact exists. Simply raising frivolous or unsupported claims to avoid judgment is unethical.
Example: "A plaintiff should not oppose summary judgment simply by asserting vague allegations without any evidence to back them up, especially if they know that the facts are clear and the law favors the defendant."
No Hiding Evidence: While the burden of proof in a motion for summary judgment is on the moving party, the opposing party still has an ethical duty to provide evidence that supports their claims. Suppressing or withholding evidence to defeat a motion for summary judgment is a breach of ethical duties.
Example: "Opposing a summary judgment motion with a false claim that evidence exists to dispute the facts, when no such evidence is available, is a violation of ethical standards."
🎯 Strategic Tip: Ensure your opposition to summary judgment is based on genuine disputes of fact, supported by reliable evidence and legal argument.
✅ The ethical considerations surrounding summary judgment motions extend beyond individual cases. Legal professionals must maintain a broader perspective on how their actions impact the integrity of the legal system. Summary judgment is a tool to enhance judicial efficiency and fairness, but it must be used responsibly to avoid undermining justice.
Maintaining Public Trust in the Legal System: When summary judgment motions are used inappropriately, they can undermine public confidence in the legal system. Ethical litigators must ensure that the summary judgment process serves its intended purpose of resolving cases efficiently, not preventing legitimate claims from being heard.
Example: "Excessive reliance on summary judgment in cases that should go to trial can lead to perceptions that the legal system is biased or unfair, especially when parties are denied their day in court."
Legal Profession’s Integrity: The legal profession relies on the principle of fairness, and litigators must be aware of the ethical implications of their actions in filing or opposing summary judgment motions. Upholding these ethical standards ensures the continued credibility and integrity of the legal system.
Example: "Litigators should act in accordance with the highest ethical standards, ensuring that their use of summary judgment is fair, transparent, and just."
🎯 Strategic Tip: Always consider the broader ethical implications of summary judgment motions, ensuring that the process remains fair, transparent, and beneficial to the integrity of the legal system.
Summary judgment is a powerful tool that can enhance the efficiency of the judicial system, but it must be used ethically. Litigators have a responsibility to ensure that summary judgment motions are based on merit and genuine disputes of fact, and to oppose them in good faith when appropriate. By adhering to ethical standards, litigators help ensure that the legal system remains fair and just for all parties involved.
At Legal Husk, we guide litigators through the ethical considerations of summary judgment, helping them navigate the complexities of the litigation process with integrity and professionalism.
📌 Need assistance with filing or opposing summary judgment motions ethically?
👉 Visit:
🔗 legalhusk.com
🔗 legalhusk.com/services
📩 Ready for a court-ready motion for summary judgment at a predictable price? Contact Legal Husk for expert support.
File wisely. Litigate efficiently—Legal Husk.
Whether you are dealing with a complex family matter, facing criminal charges, or navigating the intricacies of business law, our mission is to provide you with comprehensive, compassionate, and expert legal guidance.
