Vague, overbroad, or confusing discovery requests can derail your case before it begins. Learn the top mistakes attorneys make when drafting discovery—and how to fix them with clarity, compliance, and purpose.
Discovery is the engine room of civil litigation—but when poorly drafted, it becomes a liability instead of an advantage. Whether you're issuing interrogatories, requests for production (RFPs), or requests for admission (RFAs), small drafting mistakes can lead to big problems: irrelevant responses, boilerplate objections, or outright sanctions.
The reality is that most discovery disputes can be traced back to bad drafting—not bad faith.
At Legal Husk, we help litigators turn discovery into strategy. In this article, we reveal the top 10 mistakes attorneys make when drafting discovery requests, provide examples, and offer practical guidance to help you deliver focused, enforceable, and strategic discovery every time.
The responding party objects—or worse, provides a vague answer—because your request wasn’t clear about what you wanted.
“Produce all documents relating to your business operations.”
“Produce all contracts, invoices, and communications related to the sale of Product A between January 1, 2022, and March 31, 2023.”
Use defined terms and specify the category, time period, and subject of the request.
You get hit with an overbreadth objection—and risk having your request denied outright or trimmed by the court.
“Produce all emails ever sent by the Defendant.”
“Produce all emails between Defendant and XYZ Corp discussing the termination of the Agreement, dated June 1, 2023, to September 30, 2023.”
Narrow by timeframe, topic, or participants. Overbreadth is the most common and avoidable objection in discovery.
For interrogatories, compound questions often violate Rule 33’s limit of 25 questions and invite confusion or partial answers.
“Identify all employees involved in the incident, describe their roles, and state whether they received any disciplinary action.”
“Identify all employees involved in the incident of March 5, 2023.”
“Describe the role of each employee identified in Interrogatory No. 1.”
“State whether any of those employees received disciplinary action as a result.”
Break down multi-part questions into separate interrogatories or RFPs.
The opposing party answers narrowly—or disputes the meaning of terms like “incident,” “documents,” or “communications.”
Unclear definitions allow the other side to game your request and limit the response scope.
Include a Definitions section at the start of your discovery.
📌 Sample Definition:
“As used herein, the term ‘Subject Agreement’ refers to the contract signed between Plaintiff and Defendant dated January 15, 2022.”
Use consistent and defined terminology throughout your entire discovery set.
You waste valuable discovery bandwidth (and client money) chasing items that aren’t tied to the claims or defenses—and trigger privilege objections.
“Produce all communications between Defendant and their legal counsel.”
Only request non-privileged, relevant material. If you're targeting potentially protected communications, limit your request to factual matters or use a privilege log demand.
Cross-reference every request with Rule 26(b)(1) relevance standards before finalizing.
The court may deny your request—even if relevant—because the burden outweighs the benefit.
“Produce all financial records of Defendant since 2000.”
“Produce Defendant’s balance sheets and income statements for fiscal years 2021 and 2022, limited to operations related to Project Delta.”
Use the proportionality factors: importance, amount in controversy, access to information, and burden.
Generic discovery requests fail to reflect the specifics of your case—and often include outdated language or irrelevant prompts.
“State all facts supporting each and every denial in your Answer.”
Customize:
“State all facts supporting your denial of Paragraph 12 of the Complaint, which alleges that Defendant failed to deliver goods as agreed.”
Templates are helpful, but always revise based on the pleadings and jurisdiction.
You receive objections that your interrogatory or RFA improperly seeks a legal opinion—not a fact.
“Admit that Defendant breached the contract.”
“Admit that Defendant did not deliver the goods identified in the Agreement dated February 1, 2023.”
Ask about the underlying facts, not the legal consequence. Let the court draw conclusions.
Requests get objected to as overbroad, and responses become incomplete or irrelevant.
“Produce all documents regarding maintenance issues.”
“Produce all maintenance reports, logs, or emails regarding Unit 4B for the period January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022.”
Every discovery request should include a date range or event context unless there's a reason not to.
You miss opportunities to compel full answers, and critical evidence slips through the cracks.
Accepting objections or partial answers without challenge.
Review responses carefully
Send a deficiency letter
Schedule a Rule 37 meet and confer
File a motion to compel if needed
🎯 Tip:
Create a Discovery Response Tracker to monitor deadlines, responses, and follow-ups for each request.
Have I defined my terms clearly and used them consistently?
Is every question tied to a specific claim, defense, or factual issue?
Have I limited the scope to relevant timeframes and participants?
Am I asking for facts or documents—not conclusions or speculation?
Would I be able to defend this request in a motion to compel?
“Produce all communications regarding the Plaintiff.”
“Produce all written communications, including emails and text messages, between Defendant and John Smith from January 1, 2023, through March 15, 2023, that reference or discuss the Plaintiff.”
Identify decision-makers
Secure documentation of termination process
Confirm timeline and justification
INTERROGATORY NO. 3:
Identify all persons involved in the decision to terminate Plaintiff and describe their roles.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 6:
Produce Plaintiff’s personnel file, including performance reviews, disciplinary actions, and termination notice.
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 7:
Produce all communications between Defendant’s HR department and management regarding Plaintiff’s job performance from July 2022 to February 2023.
Yes—serve amended discovery or revise based on objections and meet-and-confer discussions.
The court may strike the excess questions. Stick to the 25-question limit (including subparts) under Rule 33 unless you have court approval.
Only if it’s carefully tailored to the current case. Never rely on prior discovery language without revising it for relevance and scope.
Relevance means the request relates to a claim or defense. Proportionality weighs the burden vs. benefit of the request, per Rule 26(b)(1).
Yes. Start with interrogatories to identify people, places, and timelines. Follow with RFPs to get documentation and RFAs to pin down uncontested facts.
At Legal Husk, we don’t believe in boilerplate. We believe in precision-targeted discovery that drives litigation strategy forward—not backward.
Every interrogatory, every document request, every admission we draft is designed to:
Uncover key facts
Withstand objections
Hold up in court
And most importantly, support the outcome you’re working toward
Whether you're preparing for:
A commercial dispute where clarity in contracts and communications is key
An employment litigation matter where personnel records and disciplinary history make or break the claim
A consumer protection case hinging on misrepresentations and refund policies
—our discovery drafting is built to align with your goals, your deadlines, and your jurisdiction.
🛠️ We provide:
Custom, case-specific interrogatories, RFPs, and RFAs
Full discovery packages organized by claim, defense, or party type
Discovery consulting to guide your in-house team or support complex litigation
Rapid turnaround for pressing motion or court deadlines
📩 Don’t leave discovery to chance or templates. Let us help you draft with confidence, compliance, and strategic foresight.
👉 Visit: https://legalhusk.com/
👉 Get to Know more about us: https://legalhusk.com/about-us
🔗 Learn more about our litigation services: https://legalhusk.com/services/
📞 Schedule a discovery consult today—and start extracting the facts that move your case forward.
File wisely. Litigate efficiently. Win consistently—with Legal Husk.
📩 Ready for a court-ready discovery at a predictable price? ContactLegal Husk for expert support.
Whether you are dealing with a complex family matter, facing criminal charges, or navigating the intricacies of business law, our mission is to provide you with comprehensive, compassionate, and expert legal guidance.
