While arbitration is often touted as a streamlined alternative to litigation, discovery remains a crucial battleground. Knowing how to craft effective and enforceable discovery requests in arbitration can make the difference between a swift resolution and a stalled, contentious process.
Arbitration offers a more private, flexible, and often faster resolution to legal disputes compared to court litigation. However, discovery in arbitration operates under different rules—often limited in scope, less formal, and governed by arbitrator discretion rather than strict procedural codes.
Despite these differences, discovery remains a powerful tool for uncovering essential facts and shaping legal strategies. Poorly drafted requests may be rejected outright or viewed as burdensome by arbitrators. In contrast, targeted, relevant, and well-reasoned discovery can yield game-changing information that strengthens your case.
❗ Yet, the informal nature of arbitration can work against you without the right strategic approach. Arbitrators may deny requests they deem excessive, irrelevant, or inconsistent with the spirit of efficiency that arbitration promotes.
✅ Understanding how to navigate the nuances of discovery in arbitration empowers legal teams to obtain the evidence they need—while preserving procedural fairness and minimizing conflict.
Success in arbitration discovery hinges on crafting requests that are:
✔️ Focused on material issues in dispute
✔️ Proportional to the scope of the arbitration
✔️ Acceptable under arbitral rules and the tribunal’s expectations
This article equips you to:
✅ Understand how discovery works in arbitration
✅ Draft effective document and information requests
✅ Navigate resistance and arbitrator discretion
✅ Preserve efficiency without sacrificing thoroughness
Discovery in arbitration differs significantly from civil litigation due to its private, contract-based framework. Common differences include:
Unlike court litigation governed by expansive civil rules, discovery in arbitration is usually narrowly tailored. Parties may limit discovery in their arbitration agreement or leave its scope to the discretion of the arbitrator(s). Broad fishing expeditions are generally disfavored.
Discovery rules are not uniform. For example:
AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules allow document exchange and “production of relevant documents.”
JAMS Rules permit “reasonable and appropriate” discovery, including depositions in complex matters.
ICDR and ICC Rules typically allow more restricted discovery.
Understanding the applicable rules is essential to framing effective requests.
Arbitrators have broad authority to determine the scope and method of discovery. What would be routine in litigation—like interrogatories or third-party subpoenas—might be denied in arbitration unless specifically justified.
🔍 For instance, in a contractual arbitration involving a supplier dispute, a narrowly framed request for internal QC logs was granted because it directly impacted the defect claims. A broader request for "all internal correspondence" was denied as overly burdensome.
Successful discovery requests in arbitration share key characteristics:
Avoid vague or overly broad requests. Tailor each request to a clearly defined issue or claim.
📋 Example: Instead of “All documents regarding product safety,” request “All inspection reports and testing records related to the Model X product produced between January 2022 and March 2023.”
Arbitrators prioritize relevance to the claims and defenses outlined in the arbitration pleadings. Tie each request to a factual contention or legal theory.
🎯 Tip: Use language from your statement of claim or defense to justify the necessity of the information sought.
Demonstrate that your requests won’t cause delay or excessive cost. Propose phased discovery or electronic narrowing methods where appropriate.
💡 Practice Tip: Include suggested custodians, date ranges, or search terms to show diligence and proportionality.
Review institutional rules and prior decisions or preferences of your arbitrator(s), if known. Some arbitrators prefer limited document exchange only—others allow broader discovery with good cause.
While discovery in arbitration is more limited than in traditional litigation, several tools remain available to parties—each with distinct strategic uses and constraints. The key is knowing when and how to use them to stay within the bounds of arbitral efficiency and relevance.
What it is:
Document production is the most widely used and accepted form of discovery in arbitration. Parties may request relevant and material documents from one another to support claims or defenses.
How it works:
Usually exchanged after the initial hearing or case management conference.
Requests should be specific in scope (e.g., date range, custodians, document types).
Arbitrators may issue procedural orders outlining limits on production.
Best practices:
Tie requests to issues identified in pleadings or procedural orders.
Avoid duplicative or blanket requests—arbitrators may view these as inefficient.
Suggest formats (e.g., PDFs, native files) and define reasonable search parameters.
Example:
In a business valuation dispute, a claimant might request “all quarterly profit and loss statements for the relevant business unit from Q1 2021 to Q2 2023,” rather than requesting “all financial documents.”
What it is:
Written questions that a party serves on the opposing party, requiring written responses under oath.
Use in arbitration:
Rarely used unless expressly permitted by the arbitration rules or agreed to by the parties.
Seen as overly formal and potentially burdensome in most arbitration forums.
When appropriate:
Complex commercial arbitrations where factual clarity is essential.
Disputes involving technical details that can be clarified by narrative responses.
Strategic Tip:
Instead of formal interrogatories, consider requesting a “narrative statement of factual contentions” if your arbitrator prefers informal disclosures.
What it is:
Out-of-hearing oral testimony taken under oath, typically recorded and transcribed.
Use in arbitration:
Generally disfavored due to time and cost, but may be allowed in:
Complex arbitrations
Where credibility is at issue
Under JAMS, AAA, or ICDR rules with arbitrator approval
Best practices:
Limit to key witnesses or issues.
Propose depositions jointly or seek the arbitrator’s approval during a procedural conference.
Example:
In a construction arbitration, one deposition might be permitted to examine the project manager regarding change order approvals—an issue central to the claim.
What it is:
A command for a third party to produce documents or appear for testimony.
Limitations in arbitration:
Arbitrators may lack subpoena power over non-parties.
Enforcement typically requires a court’s intervention, especially under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) in the U.S.
Some jurisdictions are more restrictive than others.
When to use:
Only when the information is not available from the parties and is crucial to the case.
Expect to justify the request’s relevance and necessity to the tribunal.
Strategic Tip:
Instead of seeking formal subpoenas, consider:
Negotiating voluntary compliance with third parties.
Including discovery access clauses in your arbitration agreements for anticipated non-party records.
In arbitration, less is often more. The goal isn’t expansive discovery—it’s strategic, outcome-driven discovery that respects arbitration’s core values: speed, efficiency, and flexibility. Use these tools judiciously to strengthen your position without alienating your arbitrator or opponent.
Let me know if you'd like to add a case vignette here or include references to specific arbitration rules (e.g., ICDR, ICC, UNCITRAL) for added depth.
Be issue-focused, concise, and relevant to specific claims
Avoid duplicative or vague phrasing
Suggest formats (PDF, native files) and custodians
Limit timeframes and scope to reduce objections
Raise objections early if a request is overbroad or irrelevant
Propose alternatives or narrowed production
Collaborate in good faith during pre-hearing discovery conferences
Preserve your right to object while complying with the arbitrator’s direction
Even in arbitration, discovery disputes happen. Resolve them strategically:
Discuss scope, timing, and objections early and document all discussions. Arbitrators value cooperation.
If unresolved, present disputes promptly with a focused explanation of relevance and proportionality.
If your arbitrator issues an order governing discovery, comply fully and keep records of all productions.
💡 Strategic Insight: Arbitrators may penalize uncooperative behavior, including by drawing adverse inferences or awarding costs for delay.
🔍 Case 1 – Targeted Discovery Approved
In a franchise arbitration, the claimant’s request for sales reports from a 6-month window was granted after showing direct relevance to royalty claims.
🔍 Case 2 – Overly Broad Request Rejected
A respondent’s demand for “all corporate emails” over a five-year period was denied as disproportionate and irrelevant to the contract breach at issue.
🔍 Case 3 – Efficient E-Discovery Strategy Accepted
A party proposed keyword searches across limited custodians and produced responsive documents in native format. The arbitrator praised the approach and encouraged mutual cooperation.
🧠 Understand your arbitrator’s philosophy on discovery
📋 Tie each request to an element of your claim or defense
🤝 Collaborate early to reduce the need for formal rulings
⚖ Emphasize proportionality to keep the process moving
💬 Be prepared to defend the relevance and scope of your request succinctly
Q1: Can I serve interrogatories in arbitration?
That depends on the arbitration rules. Many do not permit them without express agreement or arbitrator approval.
Q2: What if my opponent refuses to produce documents?
Raise the issue during a procedural conference or seek an interim order from the arbitrator compelling production.
Q3: Can I obtain third-party discovery in arbitration?
Only if authorized by the rules or with court assistance. Some jurisdictions limit arbitrators’ authority over non-parties.
Q4: How can I keep discovery efficient in arbitration?
Propose phased discovery, narrow requests, and use keyword searches or custodial limits.
Q5: Will the arbitrator sanction discovery abuse?
Yes—arbitrators can impose cost-shifting, preclusion, or adverse inferences if a party obstructs discovery in bad faith.
While discovery in arbitration is more limited than in litigation, it still plays a pivotal role in case development. By crafting focused, relevant, and proportional discovery requests, parties can uncover critical facts while respecting arbitration’s core principles of efficiency and fairness.
✅ Need help drafting discovery for arbitration or managing a complex dispute?
📣 Partner with Legal Husk for Discovery Done Right
At Legal Husk, we help trial teams and legal departments:
Draft airtight discovery requests
Respond strategically to objections
Manage ESI with precision
File and defend discovery motions with clarity and confidence
🎯 Don’t let discovery disputes stall your case. Win the battle before it reaches the courtroom—with Legal Husk by your side.
👉 Visit: https://legalhusk.com/
👉 Get to Know More About Us: https://legalhusk.com/about-us
🔗 Learn More About Our Litigation Services: https://legalhusk.com/services/
📞 Schedule a Discovery Consult Today—and start extracting the facts that move your case forward.
📩 Ready to transform discovery into your advantage? Contact Legal Husk today.
Whether you are dealing with a complex family matter, facing criminal charges, or navigating the intricacies of business law, our mission is to provide you with comprehensive, compassionate, and expert legal guidance.