Requests for Production are the workhorses of civil discovery. This guide walks you through how to draft RFPs that are clear, compliant, and strategically designed to get results without triggering objections.
This guide from Legal Husk covers:
The fundamentals of RFP drafting
Common mistakes to avoid
Strategic tips for maximizing the value of your requests
Sample language and formatting best practices
Real-world scenarios
By the end of this article, you'll know how to draft RFPs that are legally sound, practically effective, and aligned with your broader case strategy.
Requests for Production are governed by Rule 34 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and parallel state rules. Their purpose is to:
Obtain documents and ESI (electronically stored information)
Inspect tangible things
Examine premises or physical property
Well-drafted RFPs should:
Target documents that support or challenge key claims or defenses
Narrow the universe of discovery
Identify custodians and data sources
🎯 Tip: Think of RFPs as the document roadmap to your deposition outlines and trial exhibits.
Never draft discovery in a vacuum. Before you begin:
Review the complaint, answer, counterclaims, and affirmative defenses
Map each RFP to an element you need to prove or disprove
Identify opposing custodians likely to hold responsive documents
Legal Issue Fact Needed Target Document Custodian RFP No. Termination Who approved it? Internal emails HR Manager RFP 3
Each RFP should be:
Numbered sequentially
Written in plain language
Focused on a single subject
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION NO. 4:
Produce all versions of the employment agreement executed by Plaintiff and Defendant, including drafts and electronically signed copies.
Include a preamble with:
Definitions (e.g., "Document," "Defendant," "Subject Property")
Instructions for production format
Timeframe for production
Avoid ambiguous phrases like "related to" without proper definitions. Instead, define key terms at the start of your discovery set.
📌 Example: "'Subject Agreement' means the written contract executed between Plaintiff and Defendant on or about January 3, 2022."
🎯 Use consistent terminology across all RFPs to avoid confusion or objections.
Use specific date ranges (e.g., "January 1, 2021 to March 15, 2023")
Reference known projects, topics, or individuals
Overly broad phrasing like "all documents related to your business operations"
Requests without limits on time, scope, or subject
📌 Better: "Produce all emails sent by Jane Doe regarding Project Delta between April 1 and May 15, 2023."
Use early discovery (interrogatories, disclosures) to:
Identify who held or authored documents
Understand where data resides (email, Dropbox, shared drives)
🎯 Use follow-up RFPs to target specific custodians and metadata.
Some documents lose context when printed or PDF’d. In tech-heavy or fraud-related cases, ask for:
Native files (.xls, .msg, .docx)
Metadata (author, creation date, revision history)
📌 Example: "Produce native Excel files with formulas intact, including metadata reflecting cell-level changes."
While templates help, every RFP must be:
Tailored to the case
Mapped to an issue in dispute
Free of duplicative or vague requests
🎯 Tip: Recycle structure, not substance.
Common objections include:
Overbreadth
Vagueness
Undue burden
Irrelevance
Draft with defensibility in mind:
Clarify scope, date, and custodians
Explain relevance in meet-and-confer letters
Cite pleadings or case law if necessary
Consider:
Early-phase RFPs to understand the landscape
Mid-phase RFPs to follow up on depositions
Late-phase RFPs to lock down trial exhibits or address newly discovered evidence
📌 Example: After deposing the COO, serve a supplemental RFP for emails discussed in the deposition transcript.
🎯 Why It Matters:
Drafting strong Requests for Production is only half the job. The other half—and the part that often determines whether your discovery actually delivers results—is what you do after the requests are served.
In civil litigation, parties routinely:
Miss production deadlines
Serve partial or non-compliant responses
Withhold documents without explanation
Object without clarification
Delay production until it’s too late to act
The only way to stay ahead is to track discovery responses with the same precision you bring to your drafting.
🎯 Use a central tracker, whether in Excel, Airtable, or your case management platform, to update these data points across all active matters.
Send a deficiency letter within 3–5 business days of receiving vague or incomplete responses
Initiate a meet-and-confer before moving to compel—document all efforts
Calendar Rule 37 motions in advance to preserve your enforcement rights
Flag high-value documents for review, redaction, or deposition exhibits
Log withheld items early—don’t wait for a privilege dispute to erupt
One of the most common (and risky) missteps in discovery is waiting until the end of production to prepare a privilege log or document index.
Instead, track production as you review:
List each document by Bates number, title, custodian, and production status
Tag documents as “produced,” “withheld – privileged,” or “pending review”
Maintain metadata on withheld documents, including author, date, and privilege claimed
📌 Tip: Courts are increasingly critical of vague privilege logs. Real-time logging ensures clarity, accuracy, and credibility.
| RFP No. | Date Served | Due Date | Status | Objection? | Follow-Up | Motion Filed? | Bates Range | Priv. Log Entry |
|---------|--------------|------------|--------|-------------|-------------|------------------|---------------|------------------|\n| 5 | 5/1/2025 | 5/31/2025 | Partial | Yes (vague) | Deficiency letter sent 6/3 | Pending | LEG0001–LEG0032 | Yes |
Excel or Google Sheets – Great for small or solo practices
Airtable or Notion – Ideal for flexible filtering, linking, and team collaboration
Clio, PracticePanther, or Litify – Integrate production tracking into broader case workflows
eDiscovery platforms (e.g., Logikcull, Everlaw) – Combine production tracking with automated tagging and privilege tools
When done right, your discovery tracker becomes more than a tool—it’s a strategic dashboard for managing timelines, enforcing rights, and building a case that’s ready for trial or resolution.
Requests for Production aren’t just about collecting documents—they’re about building leverage. When drafted well, they:
Surface critical facts
Support dispositive motions
Corner opposing parties into compliance
Enable clean, organized exhibits for trial
Invest time in getting your RFPs right—and they’ll pay off across every phase of litigation.
There’s no numerical limit under Rule 34, but local rules or court orders may impose limits. Always check jurisdictional rules.
Yes—if the responding party has possession, custody, or control over them. Be specific in your language.
Initiate a meet-and-confer. If unresolved, file a motion to compel under Rule 37.
Only if the metadata is relevant and proportional. In many cases, PDF or printed versions suffice.
Absolutely. Late-stage RFPs can help identify exhibits, authenticate documents, and organize deposition transcripts.
At Legal Husk, we understand that Requests for Production are more than just document demands—they’re discovery tools that define the structure, depth, and direction of your litigation.
Whether you're preparing discovery in a high-stakes commercial matter or managing dozens of civil cases across your docket, we help you draft RFPs that are:
Purposeful – every request mapped to a specific claim, defense, or evidentiary need
Defensible – carefully worded to withstand objections and judicial scrutiny
Strategic – sequenced to support depositions, motion practice, and trial prep
Modernized – built for real-world document environments, including ESI and cloud storage
Our discovery drafting support includes:
We don’t use boilerplate. We design each RFP around the actual issues in dispute—ensuring every request contributes to your litigation roadmap.
We help you incorporate clear instructions for file types, native formats, and metadata preservation—so you don't miss the hidden facts buried in digital records.
From first-round exploratory requests to targeted follow-ups post-deposition, we help you plan the timing and scope of each phase of discovery.
Managing production? We assist with indexing, privilege tracking, and response logging to ensure you meet deadlines, comply with court orders, and stay in control.
📩 Whether you're building a new discovery strategy or refining your firm’s templates, Legal Husk is your partner for court-ready, strategic RFPs that drive results.
👉 Visit: https://legalhusk.com/
👉 Get to Know more about us: https://legalhusk.com/about-us
đź”— Learn more about our litigation services: https://legalhusk.com/services/
📞 Schedule a discovery consult today—and start extracting the facts that move your case forward.
File wisely. Litigate efficiently. Win consistently—with Legal Husk.
đź“© Ready for a court-ready discovery at a predictable price? Contact Legal Husk for expert support.
Whether you are dealing with a complex family matter, facing criminal charges, or navigating the intricacies of business law, our mission is to provide you with comprehensive, compassionate, and expert legal guidance.